Konica vs Xerox: Who Makes the Best Copier for Your Money

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on email
Email

Konica vs XeroxIn the next and final installment in our series of articles comparing major copier brands, we come to Konica Minolta vs Xerox.

If you have read any previous entries in this series you may be familiar with how Xerox stacks up to the competition— which is to say, it doesn’t.

Xerox is not the company it once was, and can hardly be considered a serious competitor in the mid-range market, which is what we’re involved in at Dean Office Solutions.

When it comes to Konica Minolta vs Xerox printers, in the mid-range market, Konica offers a much better product than what you would get from Xerox. Konica Minolta is one of the manufacturers that has put a lot of time, effort, and resources into becoming one of the big players in the multifunctional printer (MFP) market.

Konica Minolta makes an excellent machine, but it doesn’t compete with Xerox in the absolute highest end market. Xerox is still king when it comes to production equipment, such as those at print shops which output hundreds of pages per minute.

However, that’s irrelevant in this discussion of Konica vs Xerox, as a typical business owner is not in the market for a production machine. Although it’s worth knowing in case you’re wondering why the next print shop you go into is full of Xerox machines.

At Dean Office Solutions we do not sell new Konica Minolta or Xerox machines, although we do service and repair them. On that note, I must mention that there is no winner between Konica vs Xerox when it comes to maintenance. The cost of maintenance and repair on both of these brands is generally higher than others in the same category.

Xerox parts are harder to come by, they’re more expensive, and fewer people service them. On the other hand, Konica Minolta copier models use proprietary parts that are pricey to replace. For example, Konica uses special parts called imaging units that could cost up to $500, and that’s if you only need one.

Another potential drawback of Konica Minolta machines is that some users find the interface more difficult to navigate compared to other leading brands. Less tech-savvy individuals may have a difficult time migrating to a Konica machine, so keep that in mind when considering who is going to be using it.

Konica vs Xerox: In Summary

If you’ve narrowed down your options to Konica vs Xerox, know that with Konica you’re getting a better machine but it’s not the most affordable to maintain. Although it will be easier to find Konica copier service when you need it, due to the fact more people service them.

My recommendation between Konica vs Xerox easily goes to Konica Minolta in this comparison. Konica is a hard working company that’s still on its way up, whereas Xerox coasts on its reputation and has been on a steady decline.

At this point, the very future of Xerox in the mid-range market is uncertain. When investing in a Konica machine you’re putting your money behind a company that will be a major player for a long time to come. For the best price on a Konica Minolta MFP, please inquire about our used Konica Minolta copiers.